Re: [for-linus][PATCH 05/17] ftrace: Setup correct FTRACE_FL_REGS flags for module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: 8c4f3c3fa968 ("ftrace: Check module functions being traced on reload").

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.8, v5.7.13, v5.4.56, v4.19.137, v4.14.192, v4.9.232, v4.4.232.

v5.8: Build OK!
v5.7.13: Build OK!
v5.4.56: Build OK!
v4.19.137: Build OK!
v4.14.192: Build OK!
v4.9.232: Build OK!
v4.4.232: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    02a392a0439f ("ftrace: Add new type to distinguish what kind of ftrace_bug()")
    97e9b4fca52b ("ftrace: Clean up ftrace_module_init() code")
    b6b71f66a16a ("ftrace: Join functions ftrace_module_init() and ftrace_init_module()")
    b7ffffbb46f2 ("ftrace: Add infrastructure for delayed enabling of module functions")


NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.

How should we proceed with this patch?

-- 
Thanks
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux