From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> When module loaded and enabled, we will use __ftrace_replace_code for module if any ftrace_ops referenced it found. But we will get wrong ftrace_addr for module rec in ftrace_get_addr_new, because rec->flags has not been setup correctly. It can cause the callback function of a ftrace_ops has FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS to be called with pt_regs set to NULL. So setup correct FTRACE_FL_REGS flags for rec when we call referenced_filters to find ftrace_ops references it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200728180554.65203-1-zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fixes: 8c4f3c3fa9681 ("ftrace: Check module functions being traced on reload") Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c index c141d347f71a..d052f856f1cf 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c @@ -6198,8 +6198,11 @@ static int referenced_filters(struct dyn_ftrace *rec) int cnt = 0; for (ops = ftrace_ops_list; ops != &ftrace_list_end; ops = ops->next) { - if (ops_references_rec(ops, rec)) - cnt++; + if (ops_references_rec(ops, rec)) { + cnt++; + if (ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS) + rec->flags |= FTRACE_FL_REGS; + } } return cnt; @@ -6378,8 +6381,8 @@ void ftrace_module_enable(struct module *mod) if (ftrace_start_up) cnt += referenced_filters(rec); - /* This clears FTRACE_FL_DISABLED */ - rec->flags = cnt; + rec->flags &= ~FTRACE_FL_DISABLED; + rec->flags += cnt; if (ftrace_start_up && cnt) { int failed = __ftrace_replace_code(rec, 1); -- 2.26.2
