On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 11:13:04AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:18 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > [This is an automated email]
> >
> > This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
> > fixing commit: 6dc5fd93b2f1 ("ARM: 8900/1: UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER implementation for Clang").
> >
> > The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.11, v5.4.54.
> >
> > v5.7.11: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> > 5489ab50c227 ("arm/asm: add loglvl to c_backtrace()")
> > 99c56f602183 ("ARM: backtrace-clang: check for NULL lr")
> >
> > v5.4.54: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> > 40ff1ddb5570 ("ARM: 8948/1: Prevent OOB access in stacktrace")
> > 5489ab50c227 ("arm/asm: add loglvl to c_backtrace()")
> > 99c56f602183 ("ARM: backtrace-clang: check for NULL lr")
> >
> >
> > NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
> >
> > How should we proceed with this patch?
>
> Ah, ok, I'll provide manual backports then once this hits mainline.
> In that case, should I drop the explicit `Cc: stable...` tag?
No, it's good to have it there as then you get the automatic email
saying it failed to apply :)
thanks,
greg k-h
