On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:18 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
> fixing commit: 6dc5fd93b2f1 ("ARM: 8900/1: UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER implementation for Clang").
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.11, v5.4.54.
>
> v5.7.11: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 5489ab50c227 ("arm/asm: add loglvl to c_backtrace()")
> 99c56f602183 ("ARM: backtrace-clang: check for NULL lr")
>
> v5.4.54: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 40ff1ddb5570 ("ARM: 8948/1: Prevent OOB access in stacktrace")
> 5489ab50c227 ("arm/asm: add loglvl to c_backtrace()")
> 99c56f602183 ("ARM: backtrace-clang: check for NULL lr")
>
>
> NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?
Ah, ok, I'll provide manual backports then once this hits mainline.
In that case, should I drop the explicit `Cc: stable...` tag?
(I don't think the dependency on the loglvl should be backported,
which is the source of conflict)
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
