Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 30/38] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 09:22:33AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 08:22:28AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit a900aeac253729411cf33c6cb598c152e9e4137f ]

Boot CPU0 always handle I2C interrupt and under some rare circumstances
(like running KASAN + NFS root) it may stuck in uninterruptible state for
a significant time. In this case we will get timeout if I2C transfer is
running on a sibling CPU, despite of IRQ being raised. In order to handle
this rare condition, the IRQ status needs to be checked after completion
timeout.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Hi Sasha,

can you drop this from the v5.6 stable queue please? Jon discovered that
this patch introduces a regression in v5.7, and since we don't have a
good understanding of why this is breaking things I think it'd be best
if we reverted it for v5.7 until we come up with a good fix.

I think the same applies for the other i2c/tegra patch that's 31/38 of
this series.

I've dropped both of these, thanks!

--
Thanks,
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux