Hi, On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:45:27 +0200 <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. Ah, OK. The next line is modified by multiprobe support. I'll backport it. Thank you, > > thanks, > > greg k-h > > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ > > From 6a13a0d7b4d1171ef9b80ad69abc37e1daa941b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:34:48 +0900 > Subject: [PATCH] ftrace/kprobe: Show the maxactive number on kprobe_events > > Show maxactive parameter on kprobe_events. > This allows user to save the current configuration and > restore it without losing maxactive parameter. > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4762764a-6df7-bc93-ed60-e336146dce1f@xxxxxxxxx > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/158503528846.22706.5549974121212526020.stgit@devnote2 > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fixes: 696ced4fb1d76 ("tracing/kprobes: expose maxactive for kretprobe in kprobe_events") > Reported-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c > index 362cca52f5de..d0568af4a0ef 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c > @@ -1078,6 +1078,8 @@ static int trace_kprobe_show(struct seq_file *m, struct dyn_event *ev) > int i; > > seq_putc(m, trace_kprobe_is_return(tk) ? 'r' : 'p'); > + if (trace_kprobe_is_return(tk) && tk->rp.maxactive) > + seq_printf(m, "%d", tk->rp.maxactive); > seq_printf(m, ":%s/%s", trace_probe_group_name(&tk->tp), > trace_probe_name(&tk->tp)); > > -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>