Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dm zoned: remove duplicate nr_rnd_zones increase in" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020/04/16 9:51, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 01:02:39PM +0200, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
>> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
>> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
>> id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>>
>> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>>
>>From b8fdd090376a7a46d17db316638fe54b965c2fb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:22:45 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] dm zoned: remove duplicate nr_rnd_zones increase in
>> dmz_init_zone()
>>
>> zmd->nr_rnd_zones was increased twice by mistake. The other place it
>> is increased in dmz_init_zone() is the only one needed:
>>
>> 1131                 zmd->nr_useable_zones++;
>> 1132                 if (dmz_is_rnd(zone)) {
>> 1133                         zmd->nr_rnd_zones++;
>> 					^^^
>> Fixes: 3b1a94c88b79 ("dm zoned: drive-managed zoned block device target")
>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c
>> index 516c7b671d25..369de15c4e80 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c
>> @@ -1109,7 +1109,6 @@ static int dmz_init_zone(struct blk_zone *blkz, unsigned int idx, void *data)
>> 	switch (blkz->type) {
>> 	case BLK_ZONE_TYPE_CONVENTIONAL:
>> 		set_bit(DMZ_RND, &zone->flags);
>> -		zmd->nr_rnd_zones++;
>> 		break;
>> 	case BLK_ZONE_TYPE_SEQWRITE_REQ:
>> 	case BLK_ZONE_TYPE_SEQWRITE_PREF:
> 
> The code on older kernels was using is/else construct instead of a
> switch. I've adjusted the patch and queued it up.
> 

I was about to do that. You saved me time :)
Thanks !

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux