On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:47:49PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:48:23 -0800 > Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > And it's now removed, because it breaks the build. If you want it in > > 3.4 (and you said you did), can you provide a version that builds? > > I updated three patches. One patch (already failed to apply) had a > dependency on another patch, but only part of it. > > I backported that part as my first patch. > > The second patch applies the patch that failed to apply. > > And the third one is the proper 3.4 backport of this patch. > > I'll send these three patches as a reply to this email. > > My tests were failing and I thought I was missing a fix, but it ended > up being a added feature that the test was expecting to exist. I made > the test check for the feature and only test if it exists. The rest of > the tests passed, so this is good to go (AFIAK). Thanks for these, I'll wait for the next 3.4-stable kernel to apply these, as the current round was tough enough to get out... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html