Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: numa: initialise numa balancing after jump label" failed to apply to 3.13-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:54:58PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 03:39:38PM -0800, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > The patch below does not apply to the 3.13-stable tree.
> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> > 
> > From c297663c0b3930491a3cb2aba4b6e5a7159c3503 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:05:42 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm: numa: initialise numa balancing after jump label
> >  initialisation
> > 
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> The most straight-forward way of applying this patch and matching upstream
> is to first backport 54a43d54 (numa: add a sysctl for numa_balancing).
> It should apply cleanly and it was an oversight that the patch was not
> included in earlier kernels as the sysctl is documented to exist.

Thanks, that worked.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]