Re: Linux 5.4.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Linux 5.4.1
From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 14:36:49 +0100
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lwn@xxxxxxx, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAG=yYwn3nYn2CmV7BWOJdBWicYPuK2DwBgz6p=bDC9nWOt6vqA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)

On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 06:32:30PM +0530, Jeffrin Thalakkottoor wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 1:28 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > You tested the performance of what?
> i tested the performance of  5.4.0 and 5.4.1

By running what specific test(s)?

thanks,

greg k-h

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux 5.4.1
  - From: Jeffrin Thalakkottoor

References:
- Linux 5.4.1
  - From: Greg KH
- Re: Linux 5.4.1
  - From: Jeffrin Jose
- Re: Linux 5.4.1
  - From: Greg KH
- Re: Linux 5.4.1
  - From: Jeffrin Thalakkottoor

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/panfrost: Make sure the shrinker does not reclaim referenced BOs
Next by Date: [PATCH] crypto: inside-secure: Fix stability issue with Macchiatobin
Previous by thread: Re: Linux 5.4.1
Next by thread: Re: Linux 5.4.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux