Re: Linux 5.4.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Linux 5.4.1
From: Jeffrin Thalakkottoor <jeffrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 18:32:30 +0530
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lwn@xxxxxxx, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20191202075848.GA3892895@kroah.com>

On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 1:28 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You tested the performance of what?
i tested the performance of  5.4.0 and 5.4.1

> And 5.4.1 is faster?
>
and it seems to me that 5.4.1 is faster than 5.4.0
-- 
software engineer
rajagiri school of engineering and technology

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux 5.4.1
  - From: Greg KH

References:
- Linux 5.4.1
  - From: Greg KH
- Re: Linux 5.4.1
  - From: Jeffrin Jose
- Re: Linux 5.4.1
  - From: Greg KH

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/panfrost: Make sure the shrinker does not reclaim referenced BOs
Next by Date: [PATCH 0/3] Kernel panic on USB removal with blkio throttling in place
Previous by thread: Re: Linux 5.4.1
Next by thread: Re: Linux 5.4.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux