On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:01:14AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:53 AM Nathan Chancellor
> <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:43:53PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >
> > > > Commit aea447141c7e ("powerpc: Disable -Wbuiltin-requires-header when
> > > > setjmp is used") disabled -Wbuiltin-requires-header because of a warning
> > > > about the setjmp and longjmp declarations.
> > > >
> > > > r367387 in clang added another diagnostic around this, complaining that
> > > > there is no jmp_buf declaration.
> > > >
> > > > In file included from ../arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c:47:
> > > > ../arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h:10:13: error: declaration of
> > > > built-in function 'setjmp' requires the declaration of the 'jmp_buf'
> > > > type, commonly provided in the header <setjmp.h>.
> > > > [-Werror,-Wincomplete-setjmp-declaration]
> > > > extern long setjmp(long *);
> > > > ^
> > > > ../arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h:11:13: error: declaration of
> > > > built-in function 'longjmp' requires the declaration of the 'jmp_buf'
> > > > type, commonly provided in the header <setjmp.h>.
> > > > [-Werror,-Wincomplete-setjmp-declaration]
> > > > extern void longjmp(long *, long);
> > > > ^
> > > > 2 errors generated.
> > > >
> > > > Take the same approach as the above commit by disabling the warning for
> > > > the same reason, we provide our own longjmp/setjmp function.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.19+
> > > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/625
> > > > Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3be25e79477db2d31ac46493d97eca8c20592b07
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > It may be worth using -fno-builtin-setjmp and -fno-builtin-longjmp
> > > > instead as it makes it clear to clang that we are not using the builtin
> > > > longjmp and setjmp functions, which I think is why these warnings are
> > > > appearing (at least according to the commit that introduced this waring).
> > > >
> > > > Sample patch:
> > > > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/625#issuecomment-519251372
> > >
> > > Couldn't we just add those flags to CFLAGS for the whole kernel? Rather
> > > than making them per-file.
> >
> > Yes, I don't think this would be unreasonable. Are you referring to the
> > cc-disable-warning flags or the -fno-builtin flags? I personally think
> > the -fno-builtin flags convey to clang what the kernel is intending to
> > do better than disabling the warnings outright.
>
> The `-f` family of flags have dire implications for codegen, I'd
> really prefer we think long and hard before adding/removing them to
> suppress warnings. I don't think it's a solution for this particular
> problem.
I am fine with whatever approach gets this warning fixed to the
maintainer's satisfaction...
However, I think that -fno-builtin-* would be appropriate here because
we are providing our own setjmp implementation, meaning clang should not
be trying to do anything with the builtin implementation like building a
declaration for it.
Cheers,
Nathan
