On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 09:48:59AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 10-07-19 20:08:55, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:02:04PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > @@ -848,7 +853,7 @@ static int dax_writeback_one(struct xa_state *xas, struct dax_device *dax_dev,
> > > if (unlikely(dax_is_locked(entry))) {
> > > void *old_entry = entry;
> > >
> > > - entry = get_unlocked_entry(xas);
> > > + entry = get_unlocked_entry(xas, 0);
> > >
> > > /* Entry got punched out / reallocated? */
> > > if (!entry || WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_is_value(entry)))
> >
> > I'm not sure about this one. Are we sure there will never be a dirty
> > PMD entry? Even if we can't create one today, it feels like a bit of
> > a landmine to leave for someone who creates one in the future.
>
> I was thinking about this but dax_writeback_one() doesn't really care what
> entry it gets. Yes, in theory it could get a PMD when previously there was
> PTE or vice-versa but we check that PFN's match and if they really do
> match, there's no harm in doing the flushing whatever entry we got back...
> And the checks are simpler this way.
That's fair. I'll revert this part to the way you had it.
I actually want to get rid of the PFN match check too; it doesn't really
buy us much. We already check whether the TOWRITE bit is set, and that
should accomplish the same thing.
