On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 02:55:31AM +0000, Chang, Kaiyen wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Sasha Levin [mailto:sashal@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 9:43 PM
To: Chang, Kaiyen <kaiyen.chang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Hunter, Adrian <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>;
ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mmc: sdhci: Handle auto-command errors
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 04:50:58PM +0800, Kaiyen Chang wrote:
> Existing data command CRC error handling on kernel 4.20 stable branch
> is non-standard and does not work with some Intel host controllers.
> Specifically, the assumption that the host controller will continue
> operating normally after the error interrupt, is not valid. So we
> suggest cherry-pick the 3 patches listed below to kernel 4.20 stable
> branch, which can change the driver to handle the error in the same
> manner as a data CRC error.
>
> 4bf7809: mmc: sdhci: Fix data command CRC error handling
> 869f8a6: mmc: sdhci: Rename SDHCI_ACMD12_ERR and
SDHCI_INT_ACMD12ERR
> af849c8: mmc: sdhci: Handle auto-command errors
>
> All of the patches above have landed on kernel 5.0 stable branch.
4.20 went EoL quite a while ago, you should be using 5.0 at this point.
I've queued these to older stable kernels, thanks.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Hi Sasha,
Actually our goal is to merge the 3 patches to 4.19.y and 4.14.y stable branch, however, I mistakenly believed that the patches should be present in 4.20.y first and did not notice that 4.20.y has been EOL. Sorry for that. Should I create another thread to issue the request for merging the 3 patches to 4.19.y and 4.14.y?
I've already queued it for 4.19 and 4.14, nothing else to do here.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
