> -----Original Message----- > From: Sasha Levin [mailto:sashal@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 9:43 PM > To: Chang, Kaiyen <kaiyen.chang@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Hunter, Adrian <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>; > ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mmc: sdhci: Handle auto-command errors > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 04:50:58PM +0800, Kaiyen Chang wrote: > > Existing data command CRC error handling on kernel 4.20 stable branch > > is non-standard and does not work with some Intel host controllers. > > Specifically, the assumption that the host controller will continue > > operating normally after the error interrupt, is not valid. So we > > suggest cherry-pick the 3 patches listed below to kernel 4.20 stable > > branch, which can change the driver to handle the error in the same > > manner as a data CRC error. > > > > 4bf7809: mmc: sdhci: Fix data command CRC error handling > > 869f8a6: mmc: sdhci: Rename SDHCI_ACMD12_ERR and > SDHCI_INT_ACMD12ERR > > af849c8: mmc: sdhci: Handle auto-command errors > > > > All of the patches above have landed on kernel 5.0 stable branch. > > 4.20 went EoL quite a while ago, you should be using 5.0 at this point. > > I've queued these to older stable kernels, thanks. > > -- > Thanks, > Sasha Hi Sasha, Actually our goal is to merge the 3 patches to 4.19.y and 4.14.y stable branch, however, I mistakenly believed that the patches should be present in 4.20.y first and did not notice that 4.20.y has been EOL. Sorry for that. Should I create another thread to issue the request for merging the 3 patches to 4.19.y and 4.14.y? Thanks, Kaiyen
