Re: [PATCH 1/9] staging: wilc1000: revert fix related to vif index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 09:39:54AM +0000, Ajay.Kathat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> On 2/7/2019 1:42 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > This patch was very confusing to review...
> 
> Apologies for the confusion.
> 
> > From a process perspective, you really should fold patches 1 and 2
> > together.  Otherwise we're re-introducing a bug.
> 
> Patch 1 and Patch 2 both are required if commit 0e490657c721 ("staging:
> wilc1000: Fix problem with wrong vif index") is applied else Patch 2 is
> enough for complete fix. For the above reason, I have divided the fixes
> into 2 patches.
> Please suggest, if I should go ahead and submit this in a single patch.
> Should I put 2 'Fixes:' tag in that merge commit or only 0e490657c721
> commit is enough.
> 

I always just go with the oldest one.  Another option is to include
both.

regards,
dan carpenter




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux