Re: [PATCH 1/9] staging: wilc1000: revert fix related to vif index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] staging: wilc1000: revert fix related to vif index
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:12:42 +0300
Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Adham.Abozaeid@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1549519927-2651-2-git-send-email-ajay.kathat@microchip.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)

This patch was very confusing to review...

>From a process perspective, you really should fold patches 1 and 2
together.  Otherwise we're re-introducing a bug.

regards,
dan carpenter

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/9] staging: wilc1000: revert fix related to vif index
  - From: Ajay.Kathat

References:
- [PATCH 1/9] staging: wilc1000: revert fix related to vif index
  - From: Ajay.Kathat

Prev by Date: [Patch v2 2/4] x86/platform/UV: kill uv_bios_call_reentrant() as it has no callers
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/9] staging: wilc1000: fix to set the correct value for 'vif_num'
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/9] staging: wilc1000: revert fix related to vif index
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/9] staging: wilc1000: revert fix related to vif index
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux