On (12/05/18 11:50), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > panic_print_sys_info() can be very verbose, and it happens much later > than dump_stack() from panic CPU. So you are guaranteed to have same > problems you are trying to avoid: "the original context gets > lost on screen" and "confused people post bad bug reports". > And it probably would be _a bit_ better to do panic_print_sys_info() before console_flush_on_panic(). --- debug_locks_off(); - console_flush_on_panic(); - panic_print_sys_info(); + console_flush_on_panic(); --- -ss