* Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 12:10:08 AM Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx> wrote: > ... > > > > Shouldn't that be <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ? > > > > > > Yes, it should: > > > > > > Final-Recipient: rfc822; stable@xxxxxxxxxx > > > Action: failed > > > Status: 5.0.0 > > > Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host mail.kernel.org[198.145.19.201] said: 550 > > > > > > 5.1.1 <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in > > > local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command) > > > > Hm, that's really weird, I've been using <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> for years and > > the commits do get picked up. I also never saw such a mailer failure. > Argh, I used stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for quite some time already. > I copied the wrong one in a rush. > > > In any case I've changed my pre-cooked alias to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > > but still I'm wondering why <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> seems to be working in > > practice - maybe Greg is picking up such commits as well, not via an email > > flow but via scripting? > Do I have to resubmit? No need, it's fine. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html