On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 12:10:08 AM Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx> wrote:
...
> > > Shouldn't that be <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ?
> >
> > Yes, it should:
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822; stable@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 5.0.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host mail.kernel.org[198.145.19.201] said: 550
> >
> > 5.1.1 <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in
> > local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command)
>
> Hm, that's really weird, I've been using <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> for years and
> the commits do get picked up. I also never saw such a mailer failure.
Argh, I used stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for quite some time already.
I copied the wrong one in a rush.
> In any case I've changed my pre-cooked alias to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> but still I'm wondering why <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> seems to be working in
> practice - maybe Greg is picking up such commits as well, not via an email
> flow but via scripting?
Do I have to resubmit?
Thanks for picking this one up that quickly,
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html