Hi Greg-san, Thank you so much for the mail. I have just confirmed that the queued patches are correct. Regards, Ikegami > -----Original Message----- > From: stable-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:stable-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Greg Kroah-Hartman > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 11:46 PM > To: IKEGAMI Tokunori > Cc: PACKHAM Chris; Brian Norris; David Woodhouse; Boris Brezillon; Marek > Vasut; Richard Weinberger; Cyrille Pitchen; linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Boris Brezillon > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change write buffer to check > correct value > > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 10:11:39AM +0000, IKEGAMI Tokunori wrote: > > Hi Greg-san, > > > > Let me confirm below. > > About the patches 2, 3 and 4 below still should I prepare the commit IDs > for revised version? > > Or those can be added to the stable trees next time without commit IDs? > > > > > Patch: 2. 85a82e28b023 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change definition naming > > > to retry write operation > > > 3. 45f75b8a919a mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase functions > > > to retry for error > > > 4. 79ca484b6130 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase functions > > > to check chip good only > > > > > > Note: The commit IDs are on mainline so there are not existed for > > > revised version patches. > > > > I think that the patches revised version are still existing on the linux-mtd > Patchwork without commit IDs. > > > <https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/list/?series=53133&state= > *> > > > > Sorry for this confirmation but I am not sure how to resolve this to apply > these revised version patches to stable trees. > > Ok, I think I have it figured out now. Look at what I have queued up to > the stable queues to verify I got it correct. > > thanks, > > greg k-h
