Hi Greg-san, Let me confirm below. About the patches 2, 3 and 4 below still should I prepare the commit IDs for revised version? Or those can be added to the stable trees next time without commit IDs? > Patch: 2. 85a82e28b023 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change definition naming > to retry write operation > 3. 45f75b8a919a mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase functions > to retry for error > 4. 79ca484b6130 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase functions > to check chip good only > > Note: The commit IDs are on mainline so there are not existed for > revised version patches. I think that the patches revised version are still existing on the linux-mtd Patchwork without commit IDs. <https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/list/?series=53133&state=*> Sorry for this confirmation but I am not sure how to resolve this to apply these revised version patches to stable trees. Regards, Ikegami > -----Original Message----- > From: IKEGAMI Tokunori > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 4:34 PM > To: 'Greg Kroah-Hartman' > Cc: PACKHAM Chris; Brian Norris; David Woodhouse; Boris Brezillon; Marek > Vasut; Richard Weinberger; Cyrille Pitchen; > linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Boris > Brezillon > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change write buffer to > check correct value > > The 1 patch below has been added to review into the following 5 trees. > > Patch: 1. dfeae1073583 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change write buffer to > check correct value > > Tree: 1. 3.18-stable > 2. 4.4-stable > 3. 4.9-stable > 4. 4.14-stable > 5. 4.17-stable > > So please applied the remaining 3 patches below as same. > > Patch: 2. 85a82e28b023 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change definition naming > to retry write operation > 3. 45f75b8a919a mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase functions > to retry for error > 4. 79ca484b6130 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase functions > to check chip good only > > Note: The commit IDs are on mainline so there are not existed for > revised version patches. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 4:23 PM > > To: IKEGAMI Tokunori > > Cc: PACKHAM Chris; Brian Norris; David Woodhouse; Boris Brezillon; > Marek > > Vasut; Richard Weinberger; Cyrille Pitchen; > > linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Boris > > Brezillon > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change write buffer to > > check correct value > > > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 07:16:47AM +0000, IKEGAMI Tokunori wrote: > > > Hi Greg-san, > > > > > > The commit IDs on mainline are below. > > > > > > 1. dfeae1073583 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change write buffer to check > > correct value > > > 2. 85a82e28b023 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change definition naming to > > retry write operation > > > 3. 45f75b8a919a mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase functions to > > retry for error > > > 4. 79ca484b6130 mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change erase functions to > > check chip good only > > > > > > Note: > > > The patches just sent today as revised are only existing with commit > > IDs on my local environment. > > > Also the patches are existing on the Linux MTD development > patchwork > > as below but the commit IDs are not assigned. > > > > > > <https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/list/?series=53133> > > > > > > If those revised patches should be applied anywhere to have commit > > IDs at first please let me know. > > > Probably it should be consulted with the MTD maintainer Boris-san. > > > > And what stable tree(s) do you want to see these applied to? > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h
