On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 03:52:49PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 05/24/2018 03:34 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On 24 May 2018 at 23:47, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 01:06:52PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > >>> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:37:37AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.133 release. > >>>> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >>>> let me know. > >>>> > >>>> Responses should be made by Sat May 26 09:31:28 UTC 2018. > >>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. > >>> > >>> Results from Linaro’s test farm. > >>> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64. > >>> > >>> Summary > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> > >>> kernel: 4.4.133-rc1 > >>> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > >>> git branch: linux-4.4.y > >>> git commit: 915a3d7cdea9daa9e9fb6b855f10c1312e6910c4 > >>> git describe: v4.4.132-93-g915a3d7cdea9 > >>> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.132-93-g915a3d7cdea9 > >>> > >>> > >>> No regressions (compared to build v4.4.132-71-g180635995c36) > >>> > >> > >> Shouldn't this compare against v4.4.132 ? > >> > >> I looked into kselftest/rtnetlink.sh test results. > >> The test history is a bit confusing. > >> > >> - v4.4.131-57-ge33795f7a573 and earlier passed > >> - v4.4.132 failed > >> - v4.4.132-30-ga102378c6551 passed > >> ... > >> - v4.4.132-70-gaa7ab28e9c5e passed > >> - v4.4.132-71-g180635995c36 and later failed > >> > >> Does that mean that this specific test is unreliable ? > > > > kselftest rtnetlink.sh test case failure is not a regression on 4.16, > > 4.14, 4.9 and 4.4 builds. > > Because it used to skip due to missing tc tool. > > > > Now the ''tc' tool added to Open Embedded build and test running and > > reported failed. > > This is not a regression in the kernel. > > It is a change in the user space. > > > > Old output > > ============ > > SKIP: Could not run test without the tc tool > > selftests: rtnetlink.sh [PASS] > > https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/225015#L2255 > > > > > > New output > > ============= > > RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported > > Cannot find device \"test-dummy0\" > > FAIL: cannot add dummy interface > > selftests: rtnetlink.sh [FAIL] > > https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/226352#L3375 > > > > Ref bug link: > > https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3834 > > > > - Naresh > > > > Which kselftest versdion do you run? Is this from linux-next? It's using kselftest from 4.16 (latest stable, as a rule). I think this patch will fix the 'Operation not supported' issue: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10424807/ Dan
