Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/92] 4.4.133-stable review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 01:06:52PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:37:37AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.133 release.
> > There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat May 26 09:31:28 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
> 
> Summary
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> kernel: 4.4.133-rc1
> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> git branch: linux-4.4.y
> git commit: 915a3d7cdea9daa9e9fb6b855f10c1312e6910c4
> git describe: v4.4.132-93-g915a3d7cdea9
> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.132-93-g915a3d7cdea9
> 
> 
> No regressions (compared to build v4.4.132-71-g180635995c36)
> 

Shouldn't this compare against v4.4.132 ?

I looked into kselftest/rtnetlink.sh test results.
The test history is a bit confusing.

- v4.4.131-57-ge33795f7a573 and earlier passed
- v4.4.132 failed 
- v4.4.132-30-ga102378c6551 passed
...
- v4.4.132-70-gaa7ab28e9c5e passed
- v4.4.132-71-g180635995c36 and later failed

Does that mean that this specific test is unreliable ?

Thanks,
Guenter

> 
> Ran 6863 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
> 
> Environments
> --------------
> - juno-r2 - arm64
> - qemu_arm
> - qemu_x86_64
> - x15 - arm
> - x86_64
> 
> Test Suites
> -----------
> * boot
> * kselftest
> * ltp-cap_bounds-tests
> * ltp-containers-tests
> * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
> * ltp-filecaps-tests
> * ltp-fs-tests
> * ltp-fs_bind-tests
> * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
> * ltp-fsx-tests
> * ltp-hugetlb-tests
> * ltp-io-tests
> * ltp-ipc-tests
> * ltp-math-tests
> * ltp-nptl-tests
> * ltp-pty-tests
> * ltp-sched-tests
> * ltp-securebits-tests
> * ltp-syscalls-tests
> * ltp-timers-tests
> * libhugetlbfs
> * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
> * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
> 
> Summary
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> kernel: 4.4.133-rc1
> git repo: https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git
> git branch: 4.4.133-rc1-hikey-20180524-200
> git commit: 9a1fc06621f38daaaa47feeaa1eeaf38db532433
> git describe: 4.4.133-rc1-hikey-20180524-200
> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linaro-hikey-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/4.4.133-rc1-hikey-20180524-200
> 
> 
> No regressions (compared to build 4.4.133-rc1-hikey-20180521-198)
> 
> 
> Ran 2610 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
> 
> Environments
> --------------
> - hi6220-hikey - arm64
> - qemu_arm64
> 
> Test Suites
> -----------
> * boot
> * kselftest
> * libhugetlbfs
> * ltp-cap_bounds-tests
> * ltp-containers-tests
> * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
> * ltp-filecaps-tests
> * ltp-fs-tests
> * ltp-fs_bind-tests
> * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
> * ltp-fsx-tests
> * ltp-hugetlb-tests
> * ltp-io-tests
> * ltp-ipc-tests
> * ltp-math-tests
> * ltp-nptl-tests
> * ltp-pty-tests
> * ltp-sched-tests
> * ltp-securebits-tests
> * ltp-syscalls-tests
> * ltp-timers-tests
> 
> -- 
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux