Re: [PATCH 1/5] mtd: m25p80: fix allocation size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -1137,14 +1135,10 @@ static int m25p_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>>  static int m25p_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
>>  {
>>       struct m25p     *flash = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
>> -     int             status;
>>
>>       /* Clean up MTD stuff. */
>> -     status = mtd_device_unregister(&flash->mtd);
>> -     if (status == 0) {
>> -             kfree(flash->command);
>> -             kfree(flash);
>> -     }
>> +     mtd_device_unregister(&flash->mtd);
>> +
>>       return 0;
>>  }
>
> I wonder if we shouldn't return "status" in here in case mtd_device_unregister()
> failed.

Sure, I thought of that earlier actually. I may send a trivial
follow-up patch for this.

Thanks,
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]