Hi,
On Thursday 15 March 2018 11:47 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 7:20 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday 19 January 2018 08:15 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 05:25:41PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>>> The AXP223 PMIC, like the AXP221, does not generate VBUS change
>>>> interrupts when N_VBUSEN is used to drive VBUS for the OTG port
>>>> on the board.
>>>>
>>>> This was not noticed until recently, as most A23/A33 boards use
>>>> a GPIO pin that does not support interrupts for OTG ID detection.
>>>> This forces the driver to use polling. However the A33-OlinuXino
>>>> uses a pin that does support interrupts, so the driver uses them.
>>>> However the VBUS interrupt never fires, and the driver never gets
>>>> to update the VBUS status. This results in musb timing out waiting
>>>> for VBUS to rise.
>>>>
>>>> This was worked around for the AXP221 by resorting to polling
>>>> changes in commit 91d96f06a760 ("phy-sun4i-usb: Add workaround for
>>>> missing Vbus det interrupts on A31"). This patch adds the A23 and
>>>> A33 to the list of SoCs that need the workaround.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: fc1f45ed3043 ("phy-sun4i-usb: Add support for the usb-phys on the
>>>> sun8i-a33 SoC")
>>>> Fixes: 123dfdbcfaf5 ("phy-sun4i-usb: Add support for the usb-phys on the
>>>> sun8i-a23 SoC")
>>>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.3.x: 68dbc2ce77bb phy-sun4i-usb:
>>>> Use of_match_node to get model specific config data
>>>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.3.x: 5cf700ac9d50 phy: phy-sun4i-usb:
>>>> Fix optional gpios failing probe
>>>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.3.x: 04e59a0211ff phy-sun4i-usb:
>>>> Fix irq free conditions to match request conditions
>>>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.3.x: 91d96f06a760 phy-sun4i-usb:
>>>> Add workaround for missing Vbus det interrupts on A31
>>>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.3.x
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> This list might get longer if the newer AXP8xx PMICs also have this
>>>> behavior. We could switch to a boolean in the per-compatible data,
>>>> or just always use polling. The yet-merged R40 support will have this
>>>> issue as well, as the R40 is paired with the AXP221. But for now,
>>>> I'd like to have something that is easier to backport to stable, so
>>>> we can at least fix this for the A23 and A33.
>>>>
>>>> Also, checkpatch.pl doesn't like the stable kernel prerequisite lines.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> merged, thanks!
>
> I see you moved this patch from your fixes branch to your -next branch.
> Is there any problem with the patch? Merge issues?
Decided to keep in -next since this is not a regression introduced in 4.16
kernel and stable kernels will anyways be updated.
Thanks
Kishon