On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:01:24PM +0000, Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Limonciello, Mario > > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 8:50 AM > > To: 'Greg KH' <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Allocate buffer on heap rather than > > globally > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 8:28 AM > > > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Allocate buffer on heap rather > > than > > > globally > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:54:10PM +0000, Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 1:52 PM > > > > > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: linux-stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko > > > > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Allocate buffer on heap rather > > > than > > > > > globally > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 01:39:19PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: > > > > > > There is no longer a need for the buffer to be defined in > > > > > > first 4GB physical address space. > > > > > > > > > > > > Furthermore there may be race conditions with multiple different functions > > > > > > working on a module wide buffer causing incorrect results. > > > > > > > > > > > > This commit has been backported from: > > > > > > commit 9862b43624 upstream > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 549b4930f057658dc50d8010e66219233119a4d8 > > > > > > Suggested-by: Pali Rohar <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > > -- > > > - > > > > > > 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > Why is this a stable patch? What bug does it fix? > > > > > > > > > > confused, > > > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > > > Greg, > > > > > > > > I realized I forgot to send this 2 weeks ago when you said a clean backport > > > > didn't work. This was a follow up from a race condition that was seen in > > > > the wild and submitted to platform-x86. > > > > > > Ok, what kernel tree(s) do you want it applied to? I need a hint please :) > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > 4.15.y please. > > > > Thank you, > > Hi Greg, > > I just wanted to follow up on this one because I noticed it's not in 4.15.y still > And there are some bug traffics about problems. Ah, ooops, this fell to the bottom of the heap, sorry. Will pick it up in the next release. > There's also another patch that was CC'ed to stable that came after it that > should be going to 4.15.y. > > I can resubmit it with those bug URLs and squash that patch if it's helpful to > you. No, no squashing patches, I want the "identical" patch that is in Linus's tree where ever possible. thanks, greg k-h