On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:54:10PM +0000, Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 1:52 PM > > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@xxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Allocate buffer on heap rather than > > globally > > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 01:39:19PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: > > > There is no longer a need for the buffer to be defined in > > > first 4GB physical address space. > > > > > > Furthermore there may be race conditions with multiple different functions > > > working on a module wide buffer causing incorrect results. > > > > > > This commit has been backported from: > > > commit 9862b43624 upstream > > > > > > Fixes: 549b4930f057658dc50d8010e66219233119a4d8 > > > Suggested-by: Pali Rohar <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > > > 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) > > > > Why is this a stable patch? What bug does it fix? > > > > confused, > > > > greg k-h > > Greg, > > I realized I forgot to send this 2 weeks ago when you said a clean backport > didn't work. This was a follow up from a race condition that was seen in > the wild and submitted to platform-x86. Ok, what kernel tree(s) do you want it applied to? I need a hint please :) thanks, greg k-h