On 2/26/18 1:10 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: > Hi. > > On pondělí 26. února 2018 20:48:33 CET Greg KH wrote: >> Yes, that's fine with me. >> >> What ever happened to this? Do you have a list of patches I should >> apply? Or a patch series? > > Here are BFQ commits that are already merged into Linus' tree: > > a78773906147 block, bfq: add requeue-request hook > 8a8747dc01ce block, bfq: limit sectors served with interactive weight raising > a52a69ea89dc block, bfq: limit tags for writes and async I/O > 8993d445df38 block, bfq: fix occurrences of request finish method's old name > 8abef10b3de1 bfq-iosched: don't call bfqg_and_blkg_put for ! > CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED > 0d52af590552 block, bfq: release oom-queue ref to root group on exit > 52257ffbfcaf block, bfq: put async queues for root bfq groups too > 9b25bd0368d5 block, bfq: remove batches of confusing ifdefs > a34b024448eb block, bfq: consider also past I/O in soft real-time detection > 4403e4e467c3 block, bfq: remove superfluous check in queue-merging setup > 7b8fa3b900a0 block, bfq: let a queue be merged only shortly after starting I/O > 1be6e8a964ee block, bfq: check low_latency flag in bfq_bfqq_save_state() > 05e902835616 block, bfq: add missing rq_pos_tree update on rq removal > f0ba5ea2fe45 block, bfq: increase threshold to deem I/O as random > > Paolo, could you please confirm we are not missing anything here? Guys, this is crazy, I'm not going to ack this for stable backports. This is everything including code cleanups. -- Jens Axboe