Hi. On pondělí 26. února 2018 20:48:33 CET Greg KH wrote: > Yes, that's fine with me. > > What ever happened to this? Do you have a list of patches I should > apply? Or a patch series? Here are BFQ commits that are already merged into Linus' tree: a78773906147 block, bfq: add requeue-request hook 8a8747dc01ce block, bfq: limit sectors served with interactive weight raising a52a69ea89dc block, bfq: limit tags for writes and async I/O 8993d445df38 block, bfq: fix occurrences of request finish method's old name 8abef10b3de1 bfq-iosched: don't call bfqg_and_blkg_put for ! CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED 0d52af590552 block, bfq: release oom-queue ref to root group on exit 52257ffbfcaf block, bfq: put async queues for root bfq groups too 9b25bd0368d5 block, bfq: remove batches of confusing ifdefs a34b024448eb block, bfq: consider also past I/O in soft real-time detection 4403e4e467c3 block, bfq: remove superfluous check in queue-merging setup 7b8fa3b900a0 block, bfq: let a queue be merged only shortly after starting I/O 1be6e8a964ee block, bfq: check low_latency flag in bfq_bfqq_save_state() 05e902835616 block, bfq: add missing rq_pos_tree update on rq removal f0ba5ea2fe45 block, bfq: increase threshold to deem I/O as random Paolo, could you please confirm we are not missing anything here? Oleksandr