On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 21:11 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 10/03/2013 08:44 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:20:28AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >> Plus the backports that are replied to this mail? > > > > I don't see any backports, did you forget to send them? > > I don't think so, they were sent and this is a log of one of them: > OK. Log says: > Sendmail: /usr/sbin/sendmail -f jslaby@xxxxxxx -i stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > jslaby@xxxxxxx > From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> > To: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: jslaby@xxxxxxx > Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Tools: hv: verify origin of netlink connector message > Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:23:50 +0200 > Message-Id: <1380792230-27255-4-git-send-email-jslaby@xxxxxxx> > X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.4 > In-Reply-To: <1380792230-27255-1-git-send-email-jslaby@xxxxxxx> > References: <524D36DC.5070506@xxxxxxx> > <1380792230-27255-1-git-send-email-jslaby@xxxxxxx> > > Result: OK > > Could you check your spam folder? Or I can bounce them directly to you? They didn't hit the list either. If they're applicable to 3.2 as well then could you send them this way? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Life is like a sewer: what you get out of it depends on what you put into it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part