On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:16:20PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 10/02/2013 10:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release. > >There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >let me know. > > > >Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013. > >Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz > >and the diffstat can be found below. > > > >thanks, > > > >greg k-h > > > > Patch testing: 3.0.99-rc1 patch applied with white-space warnings > and 3.0.99-rc2 applied cleanly. > > Tested 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 > Compile testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed > Boot testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed > dmesg regression testing: passed. dmesgs look good. No regressions > compared to the previous dmesgs for this release. dmesg emerg, crit, > alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. Thanks for testing both of these, sorry for the mess with -rc2. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html