Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] KEYS: Fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] KEYS: Fixes
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 23:44:41 +0000
Cc: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <151931642737.27713.5082532296556836948.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903

I've posted an update that converts the min() to a min_t() and tagged it:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/tag/?h=keys-fixes-20180222-2

Do you want me to repost the patches?

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] KEYS: Fixes
  - From: James Morris

References:
- [RFC][PATCH 0/6] KEYS: Fixes
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/6] KEYS: Use individual pages in big_key for crypto buffers
Next by Date: v4.4.117 build: 0 failures 0 warnings (v4.4.117)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 6/6] KEYS: Use individual pages in big_key for crypto buffers
Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] KEYS: Fixes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]