Re: [PATCH 6/6] KEYS: Use individual pages in big_key for crypto buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] KEYS: Use individual pages in big_key for crypto buffers
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 23:42:15 +0000
Cc: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Kirill Marinushkin <k.marinushkin@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <151931646922.27713.5363631712174136041.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903

David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +		l = min(len, PAGE_SIZE);

Sigh.  This needs to be a min_t().

David

References:
- [PATCH 6/6] KEYS: Use individual pages in big_key for crypto buffers
  - From: David Howells
- [RFC][PATCH 0/6] KEYS: Fixes
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: [PATCH 4.15,4.14] path.h: Include compiler types to avoid missed struct attributes
Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] KEYS: Fixes
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] KEYS: Fixes
Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] KEYS: Fixes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]