On 2/5/2018 3:14 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 2/4/2018 9:28 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
But I do wonder if the attached (completely untested!!) patch makes
things any better?
I don't think so, the macro is needed too.
Doh! Obviously. Don't know how I managed to miss that.
I'll queue up a full revert of 662591461c4b9a1e3b.
Still with the additional exception for "ec == first_ec"?
No, just a full revert for now.
The above can be fixed on top of that.
Thanks,
Rafael