"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 2/4/2018 9:28 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote: > >> But I do wonder if the attached (completely untested!!) patch makes >> things any better? > > I don't think so, the macro is needed too. Doh! Obviously. Don't know how I managed to miss that. > I'll queue up a full revert of 662591461c4b9a1e3b. Still with the additional exception for "ec == first_ec"? Bjørn