Re: Patch "tools/objtool/Makefile: don't assume sync-check.sh is executable" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/18/18 00:07, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 11:02:12 +0100 <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>
>> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
>>
>>     tools/objtool/Makefile: don't assume sync-check.sh is executable
>>
>> to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
>>     http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>>
>> The filename of the patch is:
>>      tools-objtool-makefile-don-t-assume-sync-check.sh-is-executable.patch
>> and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
>>
>> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
>> please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>>
>>
>> >From 0f908ccbeca99ddf0ad60afa710e72aded4a5ea7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:53:17 -0800
>> Subject: tools/objtool/Makefile: don't assume sync-check.sh is executable
>>
>> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> commit 0f908ccbeca99ddf0ad60afa710e72aded4a5ea7 upstream.
>>
>> patch(1) loses the x bit.  So if a user follows our patching
>> instructions in Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst, their kernel will
>> not compile.
>>
>> Fixes: 3bd51c5a371de ("objtool: Move kernel headers/code sync check to a script")
>> Reported-by: Nicolas Bock <nicolasbock@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reported-by Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I'm curious.  3bd51c5a371de wasn't marked for any -stable so why is its
> fix being merged?

Because some people/distributions/tools download a kernel-4.14 base
image and apply a patchset to create the final version (less to download).
Using patch to assemble the final version loses the x bit and voila:
build error. This patch removes the need for the executable bit,
and everyone is happy again.

-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]