On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:26:10PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 19:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > You're totally right, I discovered during my later developments that > > indeed PCID is not exposed there. So we take the hit of a full TLB > > flush twice per syscall. > > So I really think it might make sense to redo the tests with PCID, because the > assumptions you're basing your patch series on might actually not hold. I'll have to do it on the bare-metal server soon anyway. Cheers, Willy