On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 19:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > You're totally right, I discovered during my later developments that > indeed PCID is not exposed there. So we take the hit of a full TLB > flush twice per syscall. So I really think it might make sense to redo the tests with PCID, because the assumptions you're basing your patch series on might actually not hold. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part