On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 08:18:47PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:45:50AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > >> - What was the reason that you used the "WTF - never to be seen again" tone > >> instead of the regular "FAILED - if someone wants to apply..."? Or in other > >> words, what can we do to improve and not make you angry again? > > > > First off, the WTF is just an email script, don't take it personally. > > Jumping in here - tune it down a bit so it's less confusing? I guess > in general it's not all that confusing, but since we did upset you > rather badly a few months ago it's easy to jump to conclusions here > and assume that i915 maintainers once more upset Greg badly :-/ Well, I'm ignoring the 10+ patches that I had to drop because I had duplicates already applied, that did make me grumpy, but I'll live with it for now... > Just an idea in the spirit of the "make the bots friendlier" > discussion from iirc kernel summit. Normally, the script here is correct, it is rare that this type of failure happens (dependancy on a patch that failed). In fact, I think it's the first time... thanks, greg k-h