Re: WTF: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915: Fix init_clock_gating for resume" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 4.14-stable tree?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:45:50AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> - What was the reason that you used the "WTF - never to be seen again" tone
>>   instead of the regular "FAILED - if someone wants to apply..."? Or in other
>>   words, what can we do to improve and not make you angry again?
>
> First off, the WTF is just an email script, don't take it personally.

Jumping in here - tune it down a bit so it's less confusing? I guess
in general it's not all that confusing, but since we did upset you
rather badly a few months ago it's easy to jump to conclusions here
and assume that i915 maintainers once more upset Greg badly :-/

Just an idea in the spirit of the "make the bots friendlier"
discussion from iirc kernel summit.

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]