On 28-11-17, 09:43, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:20:41PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > From: Tobias Jordan <Tobias.Jordan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > commit 7978db344719dab1e56d05e6fc04aaaddcde0a5e upstream.
> >
> > The for_each_available_child_of_node() loop in _of_add_opp_table_v2()
> > doesn't drop the reference to "np" on errors. Fix that.
> >
> > Fixes: 274659029c9d (PM / OPP: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings)
> > Cc: 4.4 <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.4
> > Signed-off-by: Tobias Jordan <Tobias.Jordan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [ VK: Improved commit log. ]
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/power/opp/core.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> > index b8e76f75073b..0b4190a1efaa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> > @@ -1199,6 +1199,7 @@ static int _of_add_opp_table_v2(struct device *dev, struct device_node *opp_np)
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(dev, "%s: Failed to add OPP, %d\n", __func__,
> > ret);
> > ++ of_node_put(np);
>
> I don't think you test-built this patch :(
I actually compile tested the 4.9 patch and found the function to be
exactly same in 4.4 branch and skipped it being lazy. And the laziness
always proves that it was a bad decision to skip compiling it :(
Sorry for the ++ crap (It took me several minutes to see how your
committed change is different from what I have sent) :(
--
viresh