On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 02:45:43AM +0000, alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> [ Upstream commit 1be4d3793d5a93daddcd9be657c429b38ad750a3 ] >> >> The watermark should never exceed the FIFO size, so we need to >> check against the current FIFO size instead of the theoretical >> maximum when we clamp the level 0 watermark. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Link: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__patchwork.freedesktop.org_patch_msgid_1480354637-2D14209-2D4-2Dgit-2Dsend-2Demail-2Dville.syrjala-40linux.intel.com&d=DwIDAw&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=bUtaaC9mlBij4OjEG_D-KPul_335azYzfC4Rjgomobo&m=iuPtUar-VEGbH1jmVH_UTr4C02X8fmjHUfNYix-Yc0Y&s=ha_F0zP3A1Aztp5S5e6_bqdhiuuPXhn0dRWQ58vv3Is&e= >> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >Why are these patches being proposed for stable? They're not straight up >fixes for known issues, and there's always a chance that something will >break. Who is doing the qa on this? Hi Ville, They were selected automatically as part of a new process we're trying out. If you disagree with the selection I'd be happy to drop it. -- Thanks, Sasha