On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 01:26:26PM +0000, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > Anyway, that's a side note, I don't really understand why you need/want > > fscrypt, if the only in-kernel filesystems that need it, already have > > this support? > > Ah, sorry for not explaining better - we have our own flash friendly > file system (TFFS), which is not in the tree so we have a vested > interest in fscrypto being part of the mainline kernel rather than > maintaining it separately. Ok, that makes more sense. No, sorry, I'm not going to make changes to any kernel for an out-of-tree chunk of code. We wouldn't do that in Linus's latest tree, so of course we wouldn't do it in a stable kernel tree. Get your filesystem merged and then we can talk :) thanks, greg k-h