On 11 October 2017 at 23:14, Tom Gall <tom.gall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> * libhugetlbfs - 76 pass - 1 skip >>> * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - 1 pass >>> * ltp-commands-tests - 27 pass - 13 skip - 5 known failures (ksh not in test img) >>> * ltp-containers-tests - 63 pass - 18 fail (these are being looked at looks like setup issues with veth0) >>> * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - 2 pass >>> * ltp-filecaps-tests - 2 pass >>> * ltp-fs-tests - 61 pass - 1 skip >>> * ltp-fs_bind-tests - 2 pass >>> * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - 19 pass >>> * ltp-fsx-tests - 2 pass >>> * ltp-hugetlb-tests - 22 pass >>> * ltp-io-tests - 3 pass >>> * ltp-ipc-tests - 9 pass >>> * ltp-math-tests - 11 pass >>> * ltp-nptl-tests - 2 pass >>> * ltp-pty-tests - 4 pass >>> * ltp-sched-tests - 13 pass - 1 skip >>> * ltp-securebits-tests - 4 pass >>> * ltp-syscalls-tests - 960 pass - 164 skip - 13 known failures >> >> syscalls fail? Why skip so many? > > The known failures are due to our x86 box using an NFS root file > system. That won't be the case much longer. I'm not sure that is entirely correct. The 'skip' test cases come from LTP itself. A few examples below: bdflush01 2 TCONF : bdflush01.c:118: syscall(-1) __NR_bdflush not supported on your arch bdflush01 3 TCONF : bdflush01.c:118: Remaining cases not appropriate for configuration cacheflush01 1 TCONF : cacheflush01.c:134: syscall(-1) __NR_cacheflush not supported on your arch cacheflush01 2 TCONF : cacheflush01.c:134: Remaining cases not appropriate for configuration chown01_16 1 TCONF : /usr/src/debug/ltp/20170929-r0/git/testcases/kernel/syscalls/chown/../utils/compat_16.h:156: 16-bit version of chown() is not supported on your platform chown01_16 2 TCONF : /usr/src/debug/ltp/20170929-r0/git/testcases/kernel/syscalls/chown/../utils/compat_16.h:156: Remaining cases not appropriate for configuration and so on. We have the list of tests that are omitted because they cause troubles (prevent test suite to complete). The list is 32 tests long but it doesn't apply to x86. In theory we could prevent LTP from running all tests that it marks 'skip', but would that help anything? There are around 12 (maybe 13?) tests that fail because we're runnining using NFS root filesystem. As Tom noted, this should be fixed soon. Best Regards, milosz