On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:12:15AM -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > Let’s try that again with less HTML stupidness …. > > On Oct 11, 2017, at 11:05 AM, Tom Gall <tom.gall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Oct 10, 2017, at 2:50 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.92 release. > > There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu Oct 12 19:50:01 UTC 2017. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.92-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Full test results from Linaro’s test farm for 4.4. > > Note there are some further regressions we’ve seen on x15 (arm) beyond the one I reported > last night and that Sumit then commented on. > > We’ve also moved up to the recently released LTP. Those two sentances could not possibly be related now, right? :) You did test the latest version of LTP on a "known good kernel/system", ahead of time? Are these regressions to be expected? x86 doesn't even look right here: > dell-poweredge-r200 - x86_64 > * boot - 1 pass > * kselftest - 44 pass - 24 known failures 1/3 failure is ok? > * libhugetlbfs - 76 pass - 1 skip > * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - 1 pass > * ltp-commands-tests - 27 pass - 13 skip - 5 known failures (ksh not in test img) > * ltp-containers-tests - 63 pass - 18 fail (these are being looked at looks like setup issues with veth0) > * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - 2 pass > * ltp-filecaps-tests - 2 pass > * ltp-fs-tests - 61 pass - 1 skip > * ltp-fs_bind-tests - 2 pass > * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - 19 pass > * ltp-fsx-tests - 2 pass > * ltp-hugetlb-tests - 22 pass > * ltp-io-tests - 3 pass > * ltp-ipc-tests - 9 pass > * ltp-math-tests - 11 pass > * ltp-nptl-tests - 2 pass > * ltp-pty-tests - 4 pass > * ltp-sched-tests - 13 pass - 1 skip > * ltp-securebits-tests - 4 pass > * ltp-syscalls-tests - 960 pass - 164 skip - 13 known failures syscalls fail? Why skip so many? thanks, greg k-h