The patch fails because the radeon stable-patch it was supposed to
improve upon wasn't included into 4.4, 4.9, 4.11, only its amdgpu
counterpart. See the "Fixes" reference for the stable patch that is a
dependency of this one.
However, looking at this comment from display line buffer setup code
"For display widths larger than 4096, you need use to use 2 display
controllers and combine them using the stereo blender.", we might not be
doing that well for > 4k horizontal resolutions anyway, with or without
this patch, as i don't think that is implemented for radeon-kms.
-mario
On 06/17/2017 07:36 PM, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.11-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 55f61a040e1b1ea0ba962e53ae341b4c51915bd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 07:17:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Fix overflow of watermark calcs at > 4k
resolutions.
Commit e6b9a6c84b93
("drm/radeon: Make display watermark calculations more accurate")
made watermark calculations more accurate, but not for > 4k
resolutions on 32-Bit architectures, as it introduced an integer
overflow for those setups and resolutions.
Fix this by proper u64 casting and division.
Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: e6b9a6c84b93 ("drm/radeon: Make display watermark calculations more accurate")
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
index 008c145b7f29..ca44233ceacc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
@@ -9267,8 +9267,11 @@ static void dce8_program_watermarks(struct radeon_device *rdev,
u32 tmp, wm_mask;
if (radeon_crtc->base.enabled && num_heads && mode) {
- active_time = 1000000UL * (u32)mode->crtc_hdisplay / (u32)mode->clock;
- line_time = min((u32) (1000000UL * (u32)mode->crtc_htotal / (u32)mode->clock), (u32)65535);
+ active_time = (u32) div_u64((u64)mode->crtc_hdisplay * 1000000,
+ (u32)mode->clock);
+ line_time = (u32) div_u64((u64)mode->crtc_htotal * 1000000,
+ (u32)mode->clock);
+ line_time = min(line_time, (u32)65535);
/* watermark for high clocks */
if ((rdev->pm.pm_method == PM_METHOD_DPM) &&
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c
index 0bf103536404..534637203e70 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c
@@ -2266,8 +2266,11 @@ static void evergreen_program_watermarks(struct radeon_device *rdev,
fixed20_12 a, b, c;
if (radeon_crtc->base.enabled && num_heads && mode) {
- active_time = 1000000UL * (u32)mode->crtc_hdisplay / (u32)mode->clock;
- line_time = min((u32) (1000000UL * (u32)mode->crtc_htotal / (u32)mode->clock), (u32)65535);
+ active_time = (u32) div_u64((u64)mode->crtc_hdisplay * 1000000,
+ (u32)mode->clock);
+ line_time = (u32) div_u64((u64)mode->crtc_htotal * 1000000,
+ (u32)mode->clock);
+ line_time = min(line_time, (u32)65535);
priority_a_cnt = 0;
priority_b_cnt = 0;
dram_channels = evergreen_get_number_of_dram_channels(rdev);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si.c
index 76d1888528e6..5303f25d5280 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si.c
@@ -2284,8 +2284,11 @@ static void dce6_program_watermarks(struct radeon_device *rdev,
fixed20_12 a, b, c;
if (radeon_crtc->base.enabled && num_heads && mode) {
- active_time = 1000000UL * (u32)mode->crtc_hdisplay / (u32)mode->clock;
- line_time = min((u32) (1000000UL * (u32)mode->crtc_htotal / (u32)mode->clock), (u32)65535);
+ active_time = (u32) div_u64((u64)mode->crtc_hdisplay * 1000000,
+ (u32)mode->clock);
+ line_time = (u32) div_u64((u64)mode->crtc_htotal * 1000000,
+ (u32)mode->clock);
+ line_time = min(line_time, (u32)65535);
priority_a_cnt = 0;
priority_b_cnt = 0;