Hi,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>> this could be, I don't remember if I checked this or not :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Really, the best way here, IMHO, would be to re-verify what's going on
>>>>> with macOS and revert my orignal patch since it's, rather clearly,
>>>>> wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sure. Are you going to make a revert patch or I am?
>>>
>>> Well, after we really know what's going on with macOS and have a better
>>> fix, then who makes the revert is less important as long as problems get
>>> sorted out :-) Either way is fine for me.
>>>
>>
>> Do you have any update on this issue?
>>
>
> The patch ffb80fc672c3 ("usb: dwc3: gadget: skip Set/Clear Halt when
> invalid") still causes a regression for us. As there hasn't any update
> for the macOS issue, can I submit a revert patch for this?
I just came back from vacations ;-) I'll get back to this. Reverting
that commit won't do any good as we'd be exchanging one regression for
another. We really need to understand what's going on.
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature