Hi,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>> This patch fixes a commit that causes a hang from device waiting for
>>>> data with the wrong sequence number. The commit ffb80fc672c3 ("usb:
>>>> dwc3: gadget: skip Set/Clear Halt when invalid") adds a check to return
>>>> early depending on DWC3_EP_STALL is set or not, prevent sending the ep
>>>> halt command to HW endpoint to do CLEAR_FEATURE(ENDPOINT_HALT) request.
>>>> This was to workaround the issue for macOS where the device hangs from
>>>> sending DWC3 clear stall command.
>>>>
>>>> In USB 3.1 spec, 9.4.5, CLEAR_FEATURE(ENDPOINT_HALT) request always
>>>> results in the data sequence being reinitialized to zero regardless
>>>> whether the endpoint has been halted or not. Some device class depends
>>>> on this feature for its protocol. For instance, in mass storage class,
>>>> there is MSC reset protocol that does CLEAR_FEATURE(ENDPOINT_HALT) on
>>>> bulk endpoints. This protocol reinitializes the data sequence and
>>>> ensures that whatever pending data requested from previous CBW will be
>>>> reset. Otherwise this will cause a hang as the device can wait for the
>>>> data with the wrong sequence number from the previous CBW. We found this
>>>> failure in USB CV: MSC Error Recovery Test with f_mass_storage.
>>>>
>>>> This patch fixes this issue by checking to see whether the set/halt ep
>>>> call is a protocol call before early exit to make sure that set/clear
>>>> halt endpoint command can go through if it is a device class protocol.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: ffb80fc672c3 ("usb: dwc3: gadget: skip Set/Clear Halt when invalid")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thinh Nguyen <thinhn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> this will regress the macOS case I wrote that commit for. We need to
>>
>> no wait, it won't regress macOS, but we're still left with the problem
>> of host and peripheral being able to get DataToggle/SeqN out of sync.
>>
>
> This patch is for the regression we have. Can you provide more
> information for the macOS? I'm not sure if this is the case for macOS,
I need to find a way to reproduce it again first. When I first
reproduced it was with dwc3 running adb and connecting it to a macOS
machine.
> but maybe there is still pending transfer when it tries to send the
> request? (There shouldn't be any before issuing ClearStall command). Do
this could be, I don't remember if I checked this or not :-)
Really, the best way here, IMHO, would be to re-verify what's going on
with macOS and revert my orignal patch since it's, rather clearly,
wrong.
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature