Re: Patch "CIFS: reconnect thread reschedule itself" has been added to the 4.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:34:19PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:07:47PM +0100, Germano Percossi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 20/04/17 12:44, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:10:00PM +0100, Germano Percossi wrote:
> > > > The reason why I asked it's because I did not receive any
> > > > "Failed" notification, so I assumed you did not even try.
> > > 
> > > I tried, but for patches without any specific "Fixes:" tag, I have to
> > > just guess that if the patch does not apply, then it was not wanted
> > > to go that far back.
> > > 
> > 
> > You were right in your assumption about 18ea43113f: it could be ported
> > but it is not so important for 3.18 and 4.4 because we are not using
> > persistent handles there.
> > 
> > For what concerns a0918f1ce6 "remove bad network.." on 3.18 I just ran
> > git cherry-pick a0918f1ce6
> > on stable/linux-3.18.y without any problem.
> > Unless you use other commands with fuzz level lower than 2
> > it should apply as is.
> 
> Odd, it does apply, thanks.  I'll apply it for the next 3.18-stable
> release after the current -rc one is released in a few days.

Hm, but it isn't in 4.4-stable, you want it there too, right?  It
doesn't apply cleanly there:

Applying cifs-remove-bad_network_name-flag.patch to linux-4.4.y
Applying patch cifs-remove-bad_network_name-flag.patch
patching file fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 906 (offset -42 lines).
patching file fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1171.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1036 with fuzz 2 (offset -241 lines).
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]